Rent control policies are regulations that limit the amount landlords can increase rent, intended to keep housing affordable. Proponents argue that it makes housing more affordable and prevents exploitation by landlords. Opponents argue that it discourages investment in rental properties and reduces the quality and availability of housing.
@9L4Z23BIndependent 2wks2W
No, studies show that rent control does not lower rent
@9MKWNW42wks2W
There needs to be a fair balance between rent prices and the local cost of living. Rent control may not be the best option.
@9NDKNSF 41mins41m
No, but they should be required to show their tenant exactly how much of their rent amount is going towards the mortgage of the building, upkeep/maintenance, taxes, and other expenses of the building/complex (like paying the office workers) and how much of it they're pocketing.
@9ND93JL6hrs6H
Yes, it should be regulated by placing a limit on how high it can be and be based off of state income
@9ND49Q58hrs8H
Yes, as long as the landlord is still able to earn a profit on their properties, cover property maintenance, and are able to easily evict tenants that damage property or are not making rent payments.
@9NC928F23hrs23H
Rent control does not create reliably helpful outcomes. This question is too market specific to be at all relevant to ask here.
@9NBVCFV1 day1D
I think yes because sometimes they charge to much for something that is not worth to being rented for.
@7YS3KJPIndependent 1 day1D
I would like for something to be done, preferably a Georgian single land tax, possibly in addition to other measures like the rent caps depending on economic background, maybe?
@Paculino 1 day1D
Yes, and prohibit ownership of over three homes at any one time by any individual or for-profit entity.
@9NBRH741 day1D
Only in areas where rents are inflated, like NY, LA, SF, … if a city has limited space and too many people, the rents have to be controlled
@9N9BZRSLibertarian 2 days2D
No. Price fixing any product or service only leads to artificial scarcity and disincentivizes private industry from investing in a real solution.
@9N8XVGK2 days2D
No, but the government should stop collusion between rental companies and incentivize housing development and deregulation of zoning to increase housing availability.
@9N8W8TF2 days2D
Yes, but depending on the conditions of the place you are rented at there should be a range of price that is fair and not overly excessive.
@9N8RYD52 days2D
As long as the limit goes up with the pricing of houses in that area, time period, or value of housing.
@9N8LG4W3 days3D
If we are in a financial recession, they shouldn't be allowed to charge over a certain amount, but otherwise no.
@9N8JYJVLibertarian 3 days3D
No, but this is a state / local issue, not Federal.
Congress *could* pass a law implementing a Federal property tax on banks and corporations that own residential rental properties in states beyond the one they're incorporated in, for every dollar they charge above a certain amount.
@9N7Q5HT3 days3D
The government should intervene in the housing market to increase housing supply through a public works project and should offer this housing to undercut the local market.
The government should manage a big public rental company, with ability to set by competition the range of rent prices.
No, the government should pay for more housing to be built in conjunction with requiring that the majority of housing built be high-density rather than than luxury properties.
@9N6VWLF3 days3D
If I trusted the government, I would say to implement rent policies for landlords, but why not have govt housing for ppl who cannot fend for themselves. Yet hundreds of billions being sent to OTHER COUNTRIES for war. It is disgusting what has become of this once great country.
@9N6SBJQ4 days4D
If you love out of state and own 10 units or houses you’re an investor. You should not have rent control for non investors.if you own more than one unit or ten units then have control on those investors.cobteol investors who are gouging renters.
@9N6RHRB4 days4D
But what happens if either party wins? The Proponents have a point, but what happens to appartments in areas that are parts of high income areas? And the opponents make it seem like there is a large lack of skills in cleaning.
@9N6QYCC4 days4D
No, but there should be limits on how much a landlord can increase rent based on the previous lease agreement (no more than 10% increase from lease to lease).
@9N5XMF74 days4D
No, the government should instead pursue policies to increase the amount of housing, to reduce the cost of renting
@9N5R6CZ4 days4D
The states themselves should implement rent control policies and the goverment should just support this current
@9N5Q3RC 4 days4D
People should be able to build autonomous free/low income housing without mucj restriction, reducing their reliance on landlords.
@9N5PWJL4 days4D
Rent control is always 100% a bad idea. What is the incentive to conduct business if you cannot make a profit? Rent control is a communist tactic to eliminate private ownership of land. Bad bad bad
@9N5B9VQ4 days4D
There should only be regulations to a certain degree in certain areas or put maximum amounts in place for those poorer or more highly populated areas
@9N4YP57Republican4 days4D
No, it is in the best interests for landlords to appeal to the largest consumer base possible, the recent raising of prices however, has stopped them from actually being able to do this. Deductive reasoning suggests that there are other major underlying issues that are causing the sudden and steady raise in rent prices.
@9N4YM5C4 days4D
I think there should be a limit on how much a landlord can raise rent yearly in regards to tenants already renting. However, a prospective tenant can be asked to pay however much the landlord decides to charge.
@9N4RL9M4 days4D
Landlords can take advantage of people so therefore some people shouldnt ruin it for others and depending on the place setting and circomstances should correct the linit on how people shoul charge and depeding on where this is should determionje the limit to which shuld be charged.
@9N4LS6F4 days4D
Only if required. If prices start skyrocketing, at a certain point there should be limitations on price
@9N4LC3Y4 days4D
Yes, and there should be limits to the amount of properties a single individual can own. The government should be prioritizing policies that benefit single individual and family homeownership versus allowing landlords to buy several properties that they themselves do not reside in.
@9N48Z76Independent5 days5D
yes, absurd charges for rent should be controlled, as in their bills (water, electric, etc) is reasonable. But if the tenant has trashed the building in not just physical ways, then yes i believe they should be able to upcharge rent.
@9N3CK3JProgressive5 days5D
No, but the state should take a more active role in making sure there is enough housing inventory to prevent rents from driving homelessness.
@9N39PDQ5 days5D
No, rent control just results in a shortage of housing because less landlords are willing to rent out their homes if they are limited in what they can charge for rent.
@9N2YM7X5 days5D
Yes, but there should be minimal condition requirements maintained by landlords as well as limits to the amount of property that they can hold.
@9N2WC4X5 days5D
The government already has their hands in too much of our personal affairs. This should be a county situation since each county is presented with its own unique challenges and capabilities. Large corporations is who needs to be regulated in this and out of country owners should not be allowed.
@9N2NDHJ5 days5D
Again complicated question. There are many economic factors that impacts rent costs. People need to be encouraged to invest, yet also need to have reasonably priced housing. We live in a capitalistic society. People also need to be educated on the costs of home ownership and make choices based on what they can reasonably do.
@9N2FJTH5 days5D
Policies should be implemented to prevent corporations purchasing residential retaliate in a way that drives up prices and limits the ability of private citizens to own property.
No, because rent control has proven to be failed policy + rapidly building affordable housing and establishing a Land Value Tax would be more effective
@9MZC9HC6 days6D
The government should implement policies that make land and home ownership realistically attainable for the average American family and individual.
@9MW9W6B1wk1W
Limit number of air bnb homes. Limit hedge funds and large corporations from buying up all the housing and raising rents.
@9MW6WYQ1wk1W
No and The government should not be able to determine what rent a private landlord can charge their tenants. Establish a universal basic income program to make rent more affordable instead.
@9MVYL6WProgressive1wk1W
Yes, but these policies should be enacted along with additional oversight that ensures landlords are maintaining the housing units as well.
@9MV3VCN1wk1W
they should make the rent based around the size and how big your property is but also not let them over charge peoples rent either
@9MV2QCDRepublican1wk1W
The government should not be involved in private business but we should keep citizens safe from predators and also we should control taxes bills and inflation overall cost of living from going up
@9MTY9H5Republican1wk1W
I think that depending on how much the original cost of the home was should be cut into a percentage.
@9MT5R3R1wk1W
Get rid of the landlords entirely and distribute housing as an basic human right.
@9MSTKDB1wk1W
It depends on vacancies in relation to homeless population
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...